首页> 外文OA文献 >Book Review of: Eleanor Johnson, Practicing Literary Theory in the Middle Ages: Ethics and the Mixed Form in Chaucer, Gower, Usk, and Hoccleve
【2h】

Book Review of: Eleanor Johnson, Practicing Literary Theory in the Middle Ages: Ethics and the Mixed Form in Chaucer, Gower, Usk, and Hoccleve

机译:书评:埃莉诺约翰逊,中世纪的文学理论实践:乔,高尔,阿斯克和赫克利夫的伦理与混合形式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Eleanor Johnson's book demonstrates that “the aesthetic power of literary language—its power to make ideation sensory and hence experiential through form and style—is fundamental to late medieval experimentation with ethically transformative writing” (3–4). As that quotation indicates, Johnson is concerned with the aesthetic in its etymological meaning of sense-perceptible rather than with any notion of beauty, Kantian or otherwise. The “mixed form” of her subtitle is prosimetrum: verse and prose alternating within the same work. Her study's other key word is protrepsis, “the literary modeling of ethical transformation” within a narrative that aims to effect a comparable transformation in its readers (10). Prosimetrum and protrepsis are most clearly united in Boethius's Consolation of Philosophy, which Johnson aptly describes as “a work of literary theory-in-practice” (19) in that it both articulates and performs the proper relation between prose and verse: the former enables rational thought and linear argumentation, whose protreptic effects the latter supports by offering a sensually pleasurable reprieve from logical rigor. Johnson argues that a host of late-medieval vernacular fictions are indebted to Boethius for their explorations of the relation between mixed literary form and the potential for ethical conversion.
机译:埃莉诺·约翰逊(Eleanor Johnson)的书证明,“文学语言的美学力量-使观念具有感觉力并因此通过形式和风格进行体验的力量-对于中世纪后期具有伦理变革性写作的实验至关重要”(3-4)。正如那段引文所表明的那样,约翰逊关注的是美学意义上的可感知性,而不是关丹或其他美的概念。她的字幕的“混合形式”是简短的:在同一作品中诗歌和散文交替出现。她的研究的另一个关键词是protrepsis,即叙事中的“道德转型的文学模型”,旨在实现读者的可比转型(10)。博伊修斯的《哲学安慰》中最明显地体现了Prosimetrum和Protrepsis的结合,Johnson恰当地将其描述为“文学实践中的作品”(19),因为它既清晰地表达了散文与诗歌之间的关系,又表达了恰当的关系:前者使理性思考和线性论证,后者的有益效果通过提供逻辑上严谨的令人愉悦的缓和来支持后者。约翰逊(Johnson)认为,博伊修斯(Boethius)对许多晚期中世纪的白话小说深有感触,因为他们对混合文学形式与伦理转换潜能之间的关系进行了探索。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bahr, Arthur W.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号